Supplier audits, from finding to verified closure.

Run remote or on-site audits as an agentic workflow using your existing checklist and scoring. Kora agents prepare and cross-check evidence; your team owns findings, verifies responses, and approves closure.

A package travels from supplier to customer along one road through four checkpoints. AI cross-checks evidence, people close the finding and approve release, and the customer receives the package plus its complete trace.
§ 01 · Supplier audit workflow

One audit. One complete trail.

Kora runs supplier quality audits as one released workflow across people, systems, and AI: existing scope, checklist, and scoring; on-site or remote evidence collection; finding classification; corrective action; verification; and closure. Human approvals remain explicit, and every run retains the workflow version, decisions, evidence, and outcomes.

  1. 01

    One process, every plant

    Quality releases the scope, checklist, scoring model, roles, and approval gates as one versioned process. Every auditor follows the same version, so supplier and plant results stay comparable.

    One shared beginning
  2. 02

    Every finding has an owner

    Whether your team calls it a SCAR, 8D, NCR, or CAPA, the finding becomes a workflow with an owner, due date, required evidence, and human verification. It stays open until the returned proof is accepted.

    Nothing gets lost
  3. 03

    A complete supplier history

    Before the next audit, reviewers can see the finding, promised action, returned evidence, verifier, and closure decision without reconstructing the story from reports, email, and spreadsheets.

    The complete story
Multiple supplier plants enter one released audit process, where audits follow consistent controls, findings become owned corrective actions, proof is verified, and every result joins one supplier-quality history.
§ 02 · FAQ

What supplier quality teams ask.

The questions audit owners raise about workflows, corrective-action follow-up, integrations, and AI review.

Kora does not certify compliance. It can run the risk-based second-party audit process your organization defines, recording the released process version, scope, auditor decisions, evidence, findings, corrective actions, and approved closure. This gives teams an inspectable trail for IATF 16949 and ISO 9001 reviews.

Yes. Kora starts from the process you already run. Scope, questions, scoring, roles, and approval gates become a released workflow. When the process changes, a new release makes it clear which version governed each audit.

Yes. A finding can open the corrective-action path your team uses, with an owner, due date, required evidence, reminders or escalation paths, and a human verification step. The action stays linked to the audit that created it through closure.

Kora agents can extract or summarize documents, cross-check submitted evidence, and prepare a recommendation inside a bounded workflow task. Auditors classify findings, suppliers own corrective actions, and designated quality leaders verify evidence and approve closure.

No. Kora is the workflow execution layer between the people and systems involved in the audit. Controlled operations and integrations can read from or write to existing systems, while Kora governs the handoffs, approvals, exceptions, and execution record.

Yes. The released workflow is the same whether evidence is collected on-site or received remotely. Files, task decisions, messages, and follow-up actions remain connected to the same audit run.
§ 03 · Next step

Bring one supplier audit process.

In a demo, bring your current checklist, finding report, and corrective-action follow-up. We will map the path from audit planning to verified closure and show the evidence Kora records at every step.